Ledership

What is leadinghiphip? gibe to Shockley- Zalabak (2009) Leadership is a sue of guiding individuals, groups, and entire organization in establishing goals and sustaining action to support goals. What on the nose is meant by attractership? T here be literally hundreds of definitions roughly who a attraction is and what is considered as lead. Each definition may vary from whizz individual to an former(a) and may change from one situation to the other. For modelling we might call an individual a leader because of the soulfulnesss election to the governing body of an institution.Other times we say he/she is non a leader because he/she does not exhibit leading behaviors expected of the of a leader. In other words, we expected leadership from the legitimate position of the presidency, exclusively when that president does not exhibit leadership behaviors, we say that the president is not a leader. According to Yukl, (2002). The definition of leadership is arbitrary and very subjective. Some definitions argon much than useful than others, and there is no correct definition. Leadership theories Theories argon most useful for influencing practice when they suggest new bearings in which events and situations sewer be perceived.Fresh insight may be provided by counselling attention on possible interrelationship that the practice has failed to notice, which lowlife be further explored and tested through empirical research. If the result is a discontinue understanding of practice, the opening practice gap is significantly reduced for those concerned. (Hughes and Bush, 1991, p. 234). The quality theory This theory front surfaced in the writings of early Greeks and Romans and is public today among those who believe that leadership cannot be get under ones skined.This theory assumed that leaders has innate qualitys that made them strong, great leaders were considered to be born(p) with the ability for leadership, so it is either you have lea dership qualities or you dont . According to Shockley zalabak (2009) theory of leadership, that leaders possessed innate qualitys that made them legal is commonly referred to as the great man theory Leadership traits theory is the idea that people be born with certain character trait or qualities and since traits are associated with proficient leadership, it assumes that if you could identify eople with the correct traits, you will be able to identify leaders and people with leadership potential. It is considered that we are born naturally with traits as part of our personality this theory in compendious believes that leaders are born not made review Researches were do to define traits or personality characteristic that best predict the effective leader. List of about eighty traits or characteristic were gotten but trait arise failed to define clearly a stable set of characteristic associated with effective leadership.Even the concept of what is effective remains open to que stion. This theory does not prove a comprehensive explanation to how leaders interact with followers and meet the postulate of specific circumstances. While truly others can be born leaders, it is incorrect to worldwideize by saying that leadership traits are in born and unchangeable. Its true many of our dispositions and tendencies are influenced by our personalities and the way we are born. However, most people recognized that it is possible for person to change their character trait for the worse.Someone kn profess for being honest can learn to be deceitful, the whole idea of saying someone was change is base on the fact that people can learn big(a) traits. If people can learn character traits and become incompatible from the way they were born naturally traits can be learnt as well. A person who is prone to being dishonest can learn to be honest. A person who avoids risks can learn to take risk. It may not be easy, but it can be done. STYLE APPROACHES Leadership style ap proach focuses its attention on the leaders behavior. Leadership style is the combination of traits, skills, and behaviors leaders use as they interact with followers (Lussier, 2004) Though leadership style is based on leadership skills and leadership traits, leadership behaviors is the important component. This is utter to be the third approach to leadership studies, a consistent build of behavior is what characterizes a leader. In shifting the study of leadership to leaders style or behaviors, the style approach expanded the study of leadership to various contexts (North house, 2004).According to Shockley- Zalabak (2009) style approach or theories attempt to identify and curry the general approaches leaders use to achieve goals. These approaches are thought to be based or a leaders assumption about what motivates people to follow up goals. This theory attempts to identify a range of general approaches leaders use to influence goal achievement. These approaches are theorized to be based on the leaders assumption about what motivates people to accomplish goals.Particular approaches also reflect complex relationships among the personal characteristics of the leader. Top among the style theories is the autocratic-to-democratic continuum first proposed by Ralph while and Ronald Lippitt (1960). Autocratic style of leader is a leader who get ats conclusions with itty-bitty influence from others Shockley- Zalabak (2009). The leader that exhibits this behavior makes the decisions, gives orders to employees, and is constantly supervising his subordinate. This leader tells others what to do and usually enforces sanctions against those who chose not to comply. He views his followers as internal for goal achievement but usually feels little responsibility for employee needs and relationship Shockley- zalabak (2009). reproof Research suggests that autocratically led groups kick upstairs more in quantity than democratically led groups, but that the quality rig i s better when more democracy is practiced. Generally with autocratic styles the led are not happy so they just do as they are told not because they have the interest of the institution at heart or because they enjoy working.Democratic- Shockley-Zalabak (2009) states that this style of leaders is the one that involves followers in decision making. The leader that exhibits this behavior promotes shared decision, team work, and does not supervise his subordinates closely. He assumes followers are able to participate in decision making, they study to create a climate in which task solving can take place while preserving interpersonal relationships. It is clear that these leadership styles are opposites end of a continuum.As such, its easy to rally that a leaders leadership style s follows mingled with those ends. Criticism When a leader is democratic at times his other colleagues in leadership positions can look at him as a weakling and also the subordinates might take advantage and wants to be disrespectful. individualism style- Here the leader behaves as non-leader. Individuals and groups are expected to make their own decisions because of a hand-off approach from the leader. The laissez-faire leader is an example of non-leader. This leader expects groups and individuals to make their own decision.He gives data only when ask by group members. Criticism The success of the group depends greatly on the abilities of the group and groups members willingness to work with little or no leadership. If the groups members consist of people that need a beseech to do things they wont be able to achieve much. destitute management- According to Shockley- Zalabak (2009) this style is characterized by low concern for interpersonal relationships and labour accomplishment. This leader makes few attempts to influence people towards designate or goals.He dislikes leadership responsibilities and lets others take the responsibility that rightfully belongs to the leader. This leader is usually uncomfortable with leadership and intellectually resists the need for it. Criticism These leaders may be chiefly responsible for the failure of the group. Middle- of- the- road management- This is a style of leader who balances task and peoples concerns commonly referred to as compromised leadership or management. The leader negotiates and compromises to achieve feasible agreements and directions for action Country club management-This is a style of leaders who emphasizes interpersonal relationship at the expense of goal achievement the leader here wants to be liked and have group followers who feel support by the leader. He provides an interpersonal relationship bond that is low on task emphasis and high in interpersonal support Criticism He may want a task accomplished but will not take steps to emphasize this element to others, if members are not highly task oriented he ends up doing their work. kind of than insisting that the employees exhibit high standard s of performance. These leaders may not develop the abilities of the people under them.Team leadership This is the theoretical ideal team leaders exhibit high concern for both task and interpersonal relationships by emphasizing goal accomplishment while supporting people, it fosters a scent out of we with high performance standards. This leadership share decision making and strives for problem solving designed to solve rather than postpone problem, it respects different point of view and value diversity as long as it contributes to the group effort. Criticism Team members who support one another but do not have enough ability or information to work on problems will not be able to produce a high-quality decision.